https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8274 The court dismissed the writ petitions, concluding that the Income-tax Officer (ITO) had sufficient grounds and jurisdiction to issue the notice under Section 148. The petitioner's failure to fully and truly disclose material facts justified the reopening of the assessment. The court emphasized that the issuance of a writ of prohibition was not warranted as the ITO acted within his legal bounds. The petitions were dismissed with costs. en-us Thu, 15 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8274 The court dismissed the writ petitions, concluding that the Income-tax Officer (ITO) had sufficient grounds and jurisdiction to issue the notice under Section 148. The petitioner's failure to fully and truly disclose material facts justified the reopening of the assessment. The court emphasized that the issuance of a writ of prohibition was not warranted as the ITO acted within his legal bounds. The petitions were dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 15 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8274