https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192754 The court granted the petitioner's request to be accompanied by his lawyer during interrogation at the DRI Office under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioner's concerns about potential third-degree methods during questioning and comparisons with his brother's treatment were considered. Despite opposition from the respondent, citing legal precedent that interrogation without legal assistance does not violate constitutional rights, the court allowed the petitioner's lawyer to be present at a visible distance without the ability to hear the interrogation. The petition was allowed under these conditions, resolving the matter. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jun 2017 15:46:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192754 The court granted the petitioner's request to be accompanied by his lawyer during interrogation at the DRI Office under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioner's concerns about potential third-degree methods during questioning and comparisons with his brother's treatment were considered. Despite opposition from the respondent, citing legal precedent that interrogation without legal assistance does not violate constitutional rights, the court allowed the petitioner's lawyer to be present at a visible distance without the ability to hear the interrogation. The petition was allowed under these conditions, resolving the matter. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192754