<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1591 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192757</link>
    <description>Where a sub-contractor&#039;s service was alleged to have already suffered service tax in the hands of the principal contractor, the adjudicating authority had to verify prior taxation before fastening liability on the appellant. The order noted that the effect of value addition and change of hands also required examination before taxability could be concluded. If the same service had already been duly taxed in accordance with law, interest and penalty would not survive. The matter was remitted for fresh verification on the limited question of prior tax payment and the consequential exposure to service tax, interest, and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2017 15:46:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=473147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1591 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192757</link>
      <description>Where a sub-contractor&#039;s service was alleged to have already suffered service tax in the hands of the principal contractor, the adjudicating authority had to verify prior taxation before fastening liability on the appellant. The order noted that the effect of value addition and change of hands also required examination before taxability could be concluded. If the same service had already been duly taxed in accordance with law, interest and penalty would not survive. The matter was remitted for fresh verification on the limited question of prior tax payment and the consequential exposure to service tax, interest, and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>