<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (1) TMI 38 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8269</link>
    <description>A consolidated revisional notice and order under section 33B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 could validly cover multiple assessment years because the provision required only that the assessee be given a real opportunity of being heard; it did not prescribe a separate statutory notice for each year. In the absence of any mandatory procedural form, a consolidated revisional order was acceptable so long as no prejudice or breach of natural justice was shown. The text also notes that reliance on the assessee&#039;s initial capital in the first year did not invalidate the revisional order where other stated grounds independently supported revisional action for the remaining years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (1) TMI 38 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8269</link>
      <description>A consolidated revisional notice and order under section 33B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 could validly cover multiple assessment years because the provision required only that the assessee be given a real opportunity of being heard; it did not prescribe a separate statutory notice for each year. In the absence of any mandatory procedural form, a consolidated revisional order was acceptable so long as no prejudice or breach of natural justice was shown. The text also notes that reliance on the assessee&#039;s initial capital in the first year did not invalidate the revisional order where other stated grounds independently supported revisional action for the remaining years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>