<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (5) TMI 6 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8265</link>
    <description>Business expenditure is deductible when, judged from the businessman&#039;s point of view, it is commercially expedient and incidental to carrying on the business; on that basis, the cost of chartering a plane to bring back a deceased former chairman&#039;s body was treated as allowable because he had travelled on company business and the company would otherwise have borne his return expenses. A reasoned estimate of reasonable house rent paid to a director under service terms will not be disturbed unless shown to be unreasonable or made without application of mind; here, the lower allowance already fixed by the Tribunal was upheld because the relevant facts had not materially changed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (5) TMI 6 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8265</link>
      <description>Business expenditure is deductible when, judged from the businessman&#039;s point of view, it is commercially expedient and incidental to carrying on the business; on that basis, the cost of chartering a plane to bring back a deceased former chairman&#039;s body was treated as allowable because he had travelled on company business and the company would otherwise have borne his return expenses. A reasoned estimate of reasonable house rent paid to a director under service terms will not be disturbed unless shown to be unreasonable or made without application of mind; here, the lower allowance already fixed by the Tribunal was upheld because the relevant facts had not materially changed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>