<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (5) TMI 5 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8262</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the orders of the Income-tax Officer, Assistant Commissioner, and Commissioner of Income-tax. It held that the petitioner, a co-operative society engaged in banking, was exempt from paying the additional surcharge demanded, as it fell under the exemption provided by section 81 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court concluded that the additional surcharge is part of the total income-tax and lacked jurisdiction to demand it from the petitioner. The petition was allowed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (5) TMI 5 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8262</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the orders of the Income-tax Officer, Assistant Commissioner, and Commissioner of Income-tax. It held that the petitioner, a co-operative society engaged in banking, was exempt from paying the additional surcharge demanded, as it fell under the exemption provided by section 81 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court concluded that the additional surcharge is part of the total income-tax and lacked jurisdiction to demand it from the petitioner. The petition was allowed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>