<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (3) TMI 15 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8257</link>
    <description>Expenditure incurred to construct temporary kachcha roads and a culvert for seasonal transport of sugarcane was held to be revenue in nature because it was laid on public land, became unusable after the season, and created no enduring asset or advantage. The court treated the recurring business necessity and the verifiable factual basis as decisive, and allowed deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (3) TMI 15 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8257</link>
      <description>Expenditure incurred to construct temporary kachcha roads and a culvert for seasonal transport of sugarcane was held to be revenue in nature because it was laid on public land, became unusable after the season, and created no enduring asset or advantage. The court treated the recurring business necessity and the verifiable factual basis as decisive, and allowed deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>