<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (6) TMI 10 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8248</link>
    <description>The court held that the Income-tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment as the petitioner did not omit or fail to disclose material facts necessary for assessment, leading to the escapement of income. The notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dated 28th March 1969, was quashed, and the respondent was ordered to pay the costs of the petition to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (6) TMI 10 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8248</link>
      <description>The court held that the Income-tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment as the petitioner did not omit or fail to disclose material facts necessary for assessment, leading to the escapement of income. The notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dated 28th March 1969, was quashed, and the respondent was ordered to pay the costs of the petition to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>