<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (12) TMI 20 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8244</link>
    <description>Where the Income-tax Act treats a firm and its partners as distinct assessable entities, interest paid by a partner to the firm on personal withdrawals is real income of the firm and cannot be deducted from the partner&#039;s share of income. The doctrine of real income did not justify reducing the partner&#039;s allocated share, because the amount had accrued to and been assessed in the firm&#039;s hands before forming part of the partner&#039;s share income. A plea of impermissible double taxation also failed, as the statutory scheme permitted separate assessment of the firm and the partners. The deduction claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (12) TMI 20 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8244</link>
      <description>Where the Income-tax Act treats a firm and its partners as distinct assessable entities, interest paid by a partner to the firm on personal withdrawals is real income of the firm and cannot be deducted from the partner&#039;s share of income. The doctrine of real income did not justify reducing the partner&#039;s allocated share, because the amount had accrued to and been assessed in the firm&#039;s hands before forming part of the partner&#039;s share income. A plea of impermissible double taxation also failed, as the statutory scheme permitted separate assessment of the firm and the partners. The deduction claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>