<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (8) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8240</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, a contractor, finding a breach of natural justice principles in the tax assessment process. The assessment order was made on the same day the petitioner sought an adjournment, violating the right to a fair hearing. The court made the rule nisi absolute, remitting the matter back to the respondent for reconsideration, ensuring the petitioner a fair opportunity to present objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (8) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8240</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, a contractor, finding a breach of natural justice principles in the tax assessment process. The assessment order was made on the same day the petitioner sought an adjournment, violating the right to a fair hearing. The court made the rule nisi absolute, remitting the matter back to the respondent for reconsideration, ensuring the petitioner a fair opportunity to present objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>