<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (3) TMI 11 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8234</link>
    <description>Regularly maintained books of account cannot be rejected for best judgment assessment unless the revenue shows that they are incorrect or incomplete, or that income cannot properly be deduced from them; low gross profit, absence of a weight-wise stock register, or missing customer addresses are only corroborative factors and not sufficient by themselves. On the facts discussed, there was no finding of suppressed sales, exaggerated purchases, or omitted transactions, so rejection of the accounts was unjustified. Amounts credited to a mahimai account and later transferred to a designated charitable account were treated as collections toward trade expenses and remained taxable trading profit, despite the internal transfer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (3) TMI 11 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8234</link>
      <description>Regularly maintained books of account cannot be rejected for best judgment assessment unless the revenue shows that they are incorrect or incomplete, or that income cannot properly be deduced from them; low gross profit, absence of a weight-wise stock register, or missing customer addresses are only corroborative factors and not sufficient by themselves. On the facts discussed, there was no finding of suppressed sales, exaggerated purchases, or omitted transactions, so rejection of the accounts was unjustified. Amounts credited to a mahimai account and later transferred to a designated charitable account were treated as collections toward trade expenses and remained taxable trading profit, despite the internal transfer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>