<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (3) TMI 9 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8221</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of items 14 and 17 in Form 34A under rule 44A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 in relation to section 230A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It emphasized the importance of these items in preventing property transfers without ensuring tax liabilities are met, providing a double safeguard for revenue purposes. The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s plea for a writ of certiorari, stating that the items were essential elements aligning with the requirements of property transfer documents under section 230A. Additionally, in a separate petition, the court dismissed a writ of mandamus due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to comply with the prescribed procedure for obtaining a tax clearance certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (3) TMI 9 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8221</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of items 14 and 17 in Form 34A under rule 44A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 in relation to section 230A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It emphasized the importance of these items in preventing property transfers without ensuring tax liabilities are met, providing a double safeguard for revenue purposes. The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s plea for a writ of certiorari, stating that the items were essential elements aligning with the requirements of property transfer documents under section 230A. Additionally, in a separate petition, the court dismissed a writ of mandamus due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to comply with the prescribed procedure for obtaining a tax clearance certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>