<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (1) TMI 35 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8219</link>
    <description>Whether losses on sale of shares were business losses turned on whether the assessee was a dealer in shares or merely an investor. The Bombay HC treated the inquiry as a mixed question of fact and law and held that all material circumstances had to be considered, including the assessee&#039;s prior and subsequent assessment history. Consistent treatment as a dealer in earlier and later years was relevant evidence of the character of the transactions. The Tribunal erred in relying on isolated facts and in drawing an unsupported distinction between public and private company shares. On the totality of circumstances, the share dealings were trading transactions and the losses were deductible as business losses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (1) TMI 35 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8219</link>
      <description>Whether losses on sale of shares were business losses turned on whether the assessee was a dealer in shares or merely an investor. The Bombay HC treated the inquiry as a mixed question of fact and law and held that all material circumstances had to be considered, including the assessee&#039;s prior and subsequent assessment history. Consistent treatment as a dealer in earlier and later years was relevant evidence of the character of the transactions. The Tribunal erred in relying on isolated facts and in drawing an unsupported distinction between public and private company shares. On the totality of circumstances, the share dealings were trading transactions and the losses were deductible as business losses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>