<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (10) TMI 20 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8217</link>
    <description>Rental income from property held by an association of textile manufacturers was treated as exempt because the association&#039;s objects fell within &quot;charitable purpose&quot; as advancing an object of general public utility. The court applied the principle that a purpose need not benefit mankind at large and may still qualify if it serves a sufficiently defined and identifiable section of the public. On the memorandum of association, the income and property were dedicated to the association&#039;s objects and could not be distributed to members, and the benefited class was the defined body of textile manufacturers in the province. The earlier Supreme Court authority on trade association exemption was followed, and the income was excluded from assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (10) TMI 20 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8217</link>
      <description>Rental income from property held by an association of textile manufacturers was treated as exempt because the association&#039;s objects fell within &quot;charitable purpose&quot; as advancing an object of general public utility. The court applied the principle that a purpose need not benefit mankind at large and may still qualify if it serves a sufficiently defined and identifiable section of the public. On the memorandum of association, the income and property were dedicated to the association&#039;s objects and could not be distributed to members, and the benefited class was the defined body of textile manufacturers in the province. The earlier Supreme Court authority on trade association exemption was followed, and the income was excluded from assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>