<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 734 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344463</link>
    <description>The writ petition was dismissed by the court, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy available under the Income Tax Act. The court found that the objections filed before the Dispute Resolution Panel were rightly rejected due to delay, and the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was deemed valid and within the prescribed limitation period. The petitioner was granted liberty to appeal before the 1st Appellate Authority within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 734 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344463</link>
      <description>The writ petition was dismissed by the court, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy available under the Income Tax Act. The court found that the objections filed before the Dispute Resolution Panel were rightly rejected due to delay, and the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was deemed valid and within the prescribed limitation period. The petitioner was granted liberty to appeal before the 1st Appellate Authority within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>