<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 722 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344451</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, concluding that the adjustment of Rs. 7,21,92,932 to the Arm&#039;s Length Price was not justified. The Tribunal found that the recovery of expenses and sale of call manager phones should be excluded from the total cost for ALP determination. It upheld the use of contemporaneous data for determining ALP and addressed the exclusion and inclusion of comparables based on various grounds. The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s request for adjustments related to sales and marketing efforts, ultimately determining that the price charged by the assessee fell within the permitted range, requiring no adjustment to the ALP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:07:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 722 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344451</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, concluding that the adjustment of Rs. 7,21,92,932 to the Arm&#039;s Length Price was not justified. The Tribunal found that the recovery of expenses and sale of call manager phones should be excluded from the total cost for ALP determination. It upheld the use of contemporaneous data for determining ALP and addressed the exclusion and inclusion of comparables based on various grounds. The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s request for adjustments related to sales and marketing efforts, ultimately determining that the price charged by the assessee fell within the permitted range, requiring no adjustment to the ALP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>