<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 721 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344450</link>
    <description>The court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that the appeal was time-barred and that the Commissioner (Appeals) had no jurisdiction to condone the delay beyond the prescribed period. The court dismissed the tax appeal, answering the questions of law in favor of the revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 721 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344450</link>
      <description>The court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that the appeal was time-barred and that the Commissioner (Appeals) had no jurisdiction to condone the delay beyond the prescribed period. The court dismissed the tax appeal, answering the questions of law in favor of the revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>