<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 720 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellants&#039; service tax liability under the category of &quot;rent a cab service&quot; but remanded the matter back to the original authority for reconsideration of the quantification of service tax, considering the available abatement under Notification 1/2006 and the threshold turnover limit for small scale service providers that were not previously examined. The appeal was disposed of with these instructions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2018 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 720 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellants&#039; service tax liability under the category of &quot;rent a cab service&quot; but remanded the matter back to the original authority for reconsideration of the quantification of service tax, considering the available abatement under Notification 1/2006 and the threshold turnover limit for small scale service providers that were not previously examined. The appeal was disposed of with these instructions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>