<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 713 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344442</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the deduction of secondary freight incurred by them from their depot to the place of delivery in the determination of assessable value. The Tribunal emphasized the practical challenges in separately showing equated freight in the invoices and relied on legal principles to support the appellant&#039;s position. The decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of evidence and relevant legal precedents, ultimately setting aside the duty demand and granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2017 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 713 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344442</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the deduction of secondary freight incurred by them from their depot to the place of delivery in the determination of assessable value. The Tribunal emphasized the practical challenges in separately showing equated freight in the invoices and relied on legal principles to support the appellant&#039;s position. The decision was based on a comprehensive analysis of evidence and relevant legal precedents, ultimately setting aside the duty demand and granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>