<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 711 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the appellant seeking a refund of Terminal Excise duty for supplies to 100% EOUs. Citing precedents and legal interpretations, the Tribunal held that the refund claim before Central Excise authorities was not maintainable. Emphasizing adherence to the policy framework and appropriate forums, the Tribunal upheld the decision, referencing a directive to DGFT for resolving such matters in line with the Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:06:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 711 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the appellant seeking a refund of Terminal Excise duty for supplies to 100% EOUs. Citing precedents and legal interpretations, the Tribunal held that the refund claim before Central Excise authorities was not maintainable. Emphasizing adherence to the policy framework and appropriate forums, the Tribunal upheld the decision, referencing a directive to DGFT for resolving such matters in line with the Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>