<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 706 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344435</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalties imposed on the appellant for the loss of raw material in a fire accident. The imposition of an equal penalty amount was deemed unjustified. The interest liability would be determined based on verification of credit utilization for duty discharge, with the jurisdictional officer tasked to ascertain any interest liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2017 11:06:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 706 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344435</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalties imposed on the appellant for the loss of raw material in a fire accident. The imposition of an equal penalty amount was deemed unjustified. The interest liability would be determined based on verification of credit utilization for duty discharge, with the jurisdictional officer tasked to ascertain any interest liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>