<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 705 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the amounts recovered by the appellant through debit notes were for expenses unrelated to the assessable value of the finished goods. These recoveries were not considered additional consideration or extra amounts against the goods manufactured and cleared, thus not chargeable to duty. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 705 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the amounts recovered by the appellant through debit notes were for expenses unrelated to the assessable value of the finished goods. These recoveries were not considered additional consideration or extra amounts against the goods manufactured and cleared, thus not chargeable to duty. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>