https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344432 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against an order demanding duty, interest, and penalty for alleged clandestine clearance of goods. The appellant's consistent denial of wrongdoing, coupled with the lack of concrete evidence beyond records seized from a company's computer, led to the decision to set aside the order. The Tribunal emphasized the need for substantial evidence to support allegations of clandestine activities, ultimately allowing the appeal due to the lack of corroboration and insufficient proof of clandestine removal. en-us Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344432 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against an order demanding duty, interest, and penalty for alleged clandestine clearance of goods. The appellant's consistent denial of wrongdoing, coupled with the lack of concrete evidence beyond records seized from a company's computer, led to the decision to set aside the order. The Tribunal emphasized the need for substantial evidence to support allegations of clandestine activities, ultimately allowing the appeal due to the lack of corroboration and insufficient proof of clandestine removal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344432