<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 698 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344427</link>
    <description>Delay in filing a Customs Act appeal beyond the three-month period was condoned under Section 129A(5) where the appellant had handed papers to counsel in time and the default arose from the advocate&#039;s failure to act promptly. The Court treated the lapse as not so excessive as to bar relief and held that the appellant should not suffer prejudice for the engaged counsel&#039;s lack of diligence. The Tribunal&#039;s order rejecting the appeal as time-barred was therefore set aside, subject to payment of costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 698 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344427</link>
      <description>Delay in filing a Customs Act appeal beyond the three-month period was condoned under Section 129A(5) where the appellant had handed papers to counsel in time and the default arose from the advocate&#039;s failure to act promptly. The Court treated the lapse as not so excessive as to bar relief and held that the appellant should not suffer prejudice for the engaged counsel&#039;s lack of diligence. The Tribunal&#039;s order rejecting the appeal as time-barred was therefore set aside, subject to payment of costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>