<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 696 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344425</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that proceedings initiated before finalization of the assessment were not sustainable. The Department was advised to take appropriate measures after finalization of the Bill of Entry. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2017 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 696 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344425</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that proceedings initiated before finalization of the assessment were not sustainable. The Department was advised to take appropriate measures after finalization of the Bill of Entry. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>