https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344417 The Delhi HC held that the petitioner's show cause notice fell within the scope of Call Book Cases under para 9.3 of the Master Circular, therefore no urgency existed to consider the petitioner's plea at that stage. The court determined that the matter must await the outcome of appeals filed by the Union of India in the SC against the HC's judgment in Mangli Impex Ltd. v. Union of India. The court noted that the petitioner remained free to bring the Master Circular dated 10th March 2017 to the adjudicating authority's attention and request that adjudication proceedings be kept in abeyance accordingly. The decision effectively deferred consideration of the petitioner's jurisdictional challenge pending higher court resolution of related issues. en-us Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jul 2025 14:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344417 The Delhi HC held that the petitioner's show cause notice fell within the scope of Call Book Cases under para 9.3 of the Master Circular, therefore no urgency existed to consider the petitioner's plea at that stage. The court determined that the matter must await the outcome of appeals filed by the Union of India in the SC against the HC's judgment in Mangli Impex Ltd. v. Union of India. The court noted that the petitioner remained free to bring the Master Circular dated 10th March 2017 to the adjudicating authority's attention and request that adjudication proceedings be kept in abeyance accordingly. The decision effectively deferred consideration of the petitioner's jurisdictional challenge pending higher court resolution of related issues. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344417