https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192749 The ITAT Pune allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order sustaining the addition of expenses. The Tribunal held that no disallowance was warranted as the assessee provided full details despite using self-supported vouchers, especially considering the challenges of maintaining complete vouchers in remote areas where the assessee operated. The Tribunal concluded that the adhoc disallowance was unjustified, and the grounds raised by the assessee were accepted. en-us Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:23:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192749 The ITAT Pune allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order sustaining the addition of expenses. The Tribunal held that no disallowance was warranted as the assessee provided full details despite using self-supported vouchers, especially considering the challenges of maintaining complete vouchers in remote areas where the assessee operated. The Tribunal concluded that the adhoc disallowance was unjustified, and the grounds raised by the assessee were accepted. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192749