<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 264 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192746</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the appellant had locus standi to file the appeal under the Land Acquisition Act. However, the Court found the land acquisition proceedings invalid as the land had not vested in the Government, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:30:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 264 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192746</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the appellant had locus standi to file the appeal under the Land Acquisition Act. However, the Court found the land acquisition proceedings invalid as the land had not vested in the Government, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>