https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192741 The High Court allowed the claim under section 70 of the Indian Contract Act, awarding compensation to the respondent for goods accepted, dismissing the appellant's plea of wrongful rejection. The court emphasized the essential elements required for a cause of action under section 70 and clarified the concept of restoration, noting that as the goods were accepted, restoration was not applicable. The court criticized the lower courts for errors in judgment and upheld the compensation awarded by the High Court, ultimately dismissing the appeal and affirming the decree in favor of the respondent. en-us Thu, 28 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:19:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192741 The High Court allowed the claim under section 70 of the Indian Contract Act, awarding compensation to the respondent for goods accepted, dismissing the appellant's plea of wrongful rejection. The court emphasized the essential elements required for a cause of action under section 70 and clarified the concept of restoration, noting that as the goods were accepted, restoration was not applicable. The court criticized the lower courts for errors in judgment and upheld the compensation awarded by the High Court, ultimately dismissing the appeal and affirming the decree in favor of the respondent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192741