<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1176 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192740</link>
    <description>The Tribunal disposed of the appeal without remand, finding the appellant&#039;s plea of limitation valid based on Tribunal judgments. The first appellate authority&#039;s failure to address the limitation plea was noted, and remand was directed for reconsideration in light of natural justice principles. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of, with a remand for fresh consideration of the limitation issue by the first appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:13:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1176 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192740</link>
      <description>The Tribunal disposed of the appeal without remand, finding the appellant&#039;s plea of limitation valid based on Tribunal judgments. The first appellate authority&#039;s failure to address the limitation plea was noted, and remand was directed for reconsideration in light of natural justice principles. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of, with a remand for fresh consideration of the limitation issue by the first appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>