<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 687 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344416</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Royal Buggy qualifies as a &quot;work of art&quot; under Section 5(1)(xii) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, and is exempt from wealth tax. The court emphasized that incidental personal use does not negate its classification as a &quot;work of art.&quot; The Tribunal&#039;s decision was overturned, and the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s ruling was reinstated in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 687 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344416</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Royal Buggy qualifies as a &quot;work of art&quot; under Section 5(1)(xii) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, and is exempt from wealth tax. The court emphasized that incidental personal use does not negate its classification as a &quot;work of art.&quot; The Tribunal&#039;s decision was overturned, and the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s ruling was reinstated in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>