https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344414 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority to ascertain if the service provided by the appellant had already been taxed by the principal contractor. If proven, the appellant would not be liable for further tax, interest, or penalty. The Tribunal emphasized that imposing tax on the subcontractor when the main contractor had already paid would result in double taxation, thus ruling in favor of the appellant's position. en-us Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344414 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating authority to ascertain if the service provided by the appellant had already been taxed by the principal contractor. If proven, the appellant would not be liable for further tax, interest, or penalty. The Tribunal emphasized that imposing tax on the subcontractor when the main contractor had already paid would result in double taxation, thus ruling in favor of the appellant's position. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344414