<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 684 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of Custom House Agents regarding short payment of service tax for 2004-05 and 2005-06. The issue centered on whether reimbursable charges should be included in the gross value of taxable services. Despite a pending appeal at the Supreme Court, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellants based on judgments from the Delhi High Court and the jurisdictional High Court, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 684 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of Custom House Agents regarding short payment of service tax for 2004-05 and 2005-06. The issue centered on whether reimbursable charges should be included in the gross value of taxable services. Despite a pending appeal at the Supreme Court, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellants based on judgments from the Delhi High Court and the jurisdictional High Court, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>