<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 682 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344411</link>
    <description>The Court remanded the case involving a penalty imposed on the Assessee for taking excess credit on capital goods. The Tribunal&#039;s initial decision in favor of the Assessee was reversed upon a rectification application by the Revenue, citing a Supreme Court judgment. The Court emphasized the need for a determination on whether the penalty was a result of a mistake or deliberate deception, directing the Tribunal to conduct a fresh hearing considering all relevant aspects and legal provisions. The judgment favored the Assessee&#039;s argument of a mistake in claiming excess credit, leading to the remand of the case for further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 682 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344411</link>
      <description>The Court remanded the case involving a penalty imposed on the Assessee for taking excess credit on capital goods. The Tribunal&#039;s initial decision in favor of the Assessee was reversed upon a rectification application by the Revenue, citing a Supreme Court judgment. The Court emphasized the need for a determination on whether the penalty was a result of a mistake or deliberate deception, directing the Tribunal to conduct a fresh hearing considering all relevant aspects and legal provisions. The judgment favored the Assessee&#039;s argument of a mistake in claiming excess credit, leading to the remand of the case for further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>