https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344410 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The decision was based on the appellant's possession of drug licenses for products under their brand names, the withdrawal of the trademark registration application by the other entity, and an affidavit disclaiming ownership of the disputed trademark. The Tribunal emphasized the department's failure to establish ownership of the brand name in question, supporting the appellant's entitlement to the SSI exemption. en-us Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344410 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The decision was based on the appellant's possession of drug licenses for products under their brand names, the withdrawal of the trademark registration application by the other entity, and an affidavit disclaiming ownership of the disputed trademark. The Tribunal emphasized the department's failure to establish ownership of the brand name in question, supporting the appellant's entitlement to the SSI exemption. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344410