<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 668 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344397</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty on products classified under heading 8471 in the disputed list dated 05.11.1990, while setting aside the demand for other classifications. The appeal was disposed of with the decision that the duty demand was sustainable only for the specific list in question under heading 8471, and not for the other classifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:06:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 668 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344397</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty on products classified under heading 8471 in the disputed list dated 05.11.1990, while setting aside the demand for other classifications. The appeal was disposed of with the decision that the duty demand was sustainable only for the specific list in question under heading 8471, and not for the other classifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>