<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 660 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344389</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for modification of provisional release conditions of seized goods, citing pending export consignments to avoid demurrage charges. Following discrepancies in export goods, the Department imposed specific conditions, later modified by a High Court order. The Court emphasized alignment with previous orders, staying the bank guarantee requirement. All exporters, except one, received provisional release under revised terms. Acknowledging the common investigation, the Tribunal directed the appellant to receive the same revised terms as fairness in treatment among all exporters involved was crucial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2017 10:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 660 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344389</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for modification of provisional release conditions of seized goods, citing pending export consignments to avoid demurrage charges. Following discrepancies in export goods, the Department imposed specific conditions, later modified by a High Court order. The Court emphasized alignment with previous orders, staying the bank guarantee requirement. All exporters, except one, received provisional release under revised terms. Acknowledging the common investigation, the Tribunal directed the appellant to receive the same revised terms as fairness in treatment among all exporters involved was crucial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>