<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (3) TMI 42 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192736</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the arbitrator&#039;s awards for claims related to destroyed katcha bricks, additional wages for coolies, and interest due to errors of law. The Court found that the contractor failed to prove contractual obligations for these claims, and the arbitrator&#039;s decisions were not supported by evidence or legal provisions. The appeals were dismissed, and the High Court&#039;s decision to uphold the dismissal of the claims was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 17:55:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (3) TMI 42 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192736</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the arbitrator&#039;s awards for claims related to destroyed katcha bricks, additional wages for coolies, and interest due to errors of law. The Court found that the contractor failed to prove contractual obligations for these claims, and the arbitrator&#039;s decisions were not supported by evidence or legal provisions. The appeals were dismissed, and the High Court&#039;s decision to uphold the dismissal of the claims was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>