<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 606 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192735</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the appellants under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. Despite acknowledging the delayed tax payment, the Tribunal considered the appellants&#039; genuine but mistaken belief about tax collection timing. It referenced Section 80 of the Act, which exempts penalties if a reasonable cause for failure is proven. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals to enhance penalties, emphasizing the appellants&#039; bona fide belief and the legal provisions governing penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 15:36:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 606 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192735</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the appellants under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. Despite acknowledging the delayed tax payment, the Tribunal considered the appellants&#039; genuine but mistaken belief about tax collection timing. It referenced Section 80 of the Act, which exempts penalties if a reasonable cause for failure is proven. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals to enhance penalties, emphasizing the appellants&#039; bona fide belief and the legal provisions governing penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>