<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (11) TMI 24 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8186</link>
    <description>Legal expenditure incurred to challenge an order affecting an assessee&#039;s business and assessment position may be deductible where it is justified by commercial expediency and serves the purpose of protecting the business. On that reasoning, advocate&#039;s fees for a writ petition was treated as business expenditure. The text also states that replacement of petrol engines in buses with diesel engines can qualify as current repairs where the work merely preserves the working condition and utility of the existing transport vehicles without creating a separate new asset. The note concludes that both deductions were upheld under the business-purpose and current-repairs tests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (11) TMI 24 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8186</link>
      <description>Legal expenditure incurred to challenge an order affecting an assessee&#039;s business and assessment position may be deductible where it is justified by commercial expediency and serves the purpose of protecting the business. On that reasoning, advocate&#039;s fees for a writ petition was treated as business expenditure. The text also states that replacement of petrol engines in buses with diesel engines can qualify as current repairs where the work merely preserves the working condition and utility of the existing transport vehicles without creating a separate new asset. The note concludes that both deductions were upheld under the business-purpose and current-repairs tests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>