https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344358 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant company and its Authorized Representative in appeals concerning eligibility for CENVAT credit on welding rods and other items. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders that denied credit for certain items and imposed penalties. The penalty imposed on the authorized representative and under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 was overturned due to the lack of specific charges and evidence. The Tribunal did not address the applicability of the extended period of limitation, focusing primarily on the CENVAT credit eligibility and penalty issues. en-us Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344358 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant company and its Authorized Representative in appeals concerning eligibility for CENVAT credit on welding rods and other items. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders that denied credit for certain items and imposed penalties. The penalty imposed on the authorized representative and under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 was overturned due to the lack of specific charges and evidence. The Tribunal did not address the applicability of the extended period of limitation, focusing primarily on the CENVAT credit eligibility and penalty issues. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344358