<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 628 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344357</link>
    <description>Wrongly taken Cenvat credit reversed before utilisation is treated as not having been availed, so the conditions for interest recovery on wrongly availed or utilised credit are not met. The interest demand is therefore unsustainable. Penalty for contravention of the applicable rules may nevertheless be sustained where the recorded facts justify it. The appeal succeeds only to the extent of deleting the interest demand, while the penalty remains payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 628 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344357</link>
      <description>Wrongly taken Cenvat credit reversed before utilisation is treated as not having been availed, so the conditions for interest recovery on wrongly availed or utilised credit are not met. The interest demand is therefore unsustainable. Penalty for contravention of the applicable rules may nevertheless be sustained where the recorded facts justify it. The appeal succeeds only to the extent of deleting the interest demand, while the penalty remains payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>