<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 627 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344356</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. Commissioner (A)&#039;s ruling on the reversal of cenvat credit for inputs used in manufacturing exempted final goods. The demand for the normal period of reversal of cenvat credit along with interest was confirmed against the assessee, and the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal set aside the demand pertaining to the period beyond the limitation, finding it acceptable as per the assessee&#039;s contention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:07:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 627 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344356</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. Commissioner (A)&#039;s ruling on the reversal of cenvat credit for inputs used in manufacturing exempted final goods. The demand for the normal period of reversal of cenvat credit along with interest was confirmed against the assessee, and the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal set aside the demand pertaining to the period beyond the limitation, finding it acceptable as per the assessee&#039;s contention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>