https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344353 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for the period April 1998 to June 1998, deeming it not maintainable due to a prior similar dismissal by the Revenue. The appeal was considered an abuse of process of law. For the period September 1997 to March 1998, the Tribunal found the appellant liable to pay duty based on a precedent from the Apex Court. Consequently, duty was confirmed for this period. However, the Tribunal ruled that interest and penalty were not imposable, following another Apex Court decision. The demands for interest and penalty were set aside, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:07:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344353 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for the period April 1998 to June 1998, deeming it not maintainable due to a prior similar dismissal by the Revenue. The appeal was considered an abuse of process of law. For the period September 1997 to March 1998, the Tribunal found the appellant liable to pay duty based on a precedent from the Apex Court. Consequently, duty was confirmed for this period. However, the Tribunal ruled that interest and penalty were not imposable, following another Apex Court decision. The demands for interest and penalty were set aside, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344353