<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 620 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344349</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellants for violating licensing conditions related to operating warehouses. The case involved unauthorized removal of goods from a bonded warehouse to a non-permitted warehouse, resulting in demands for customs duty and penalties. Despite procedural violations, the Tribunal acknowledged the absence of malicious intent and accepted the explanation of temporary goods shifting due to space constraints. Ultimately, a penalty of Rs. 2,00,000 was deemed appropriate, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements while considering the circumstances and intentions behind the violation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:06:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 620 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344349</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellants for violating licensing conditions related to operating warehouses. The case involved unauthorized removal of goods from a bonded warehouse to a non-permitted warehouse, resulting in demands for customs duty and penalties. Despite procedural violations, the Tribunal acknowledged the absence of malicious intent and accepted the explanation of temporary goods shifting due to space constraints. Ultimately, a penalty of Rs. 2,00,000 was deemed appropriate, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements while considering the circumstances and intentions behind the violation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>