<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 612 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344341</link>
    <description>Imported polyester blankets were assessed to countervailing duty under section 3(1) of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1975, and the dispute concerned entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-CE despite the condition that input credit had not been availed under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal applied its earlier decision in the same matter and the Supreme Court&#039;s settled position on the scope of the exemption for imports, holding that later substitutions made by Notification No. 34/2015-CE and Notification No. 37/2015-CE operated prospectively only. The denial of CVD exemption was therefore unsustainable and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 612 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344341</link>
      <description>Imported polyester blankets were assessed to countervailing duty under section 3(1) of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1975, and the dispute concerned entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-CE despite the condition that input credit had not been availed under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal applied its earlier decision in the same matter and the Supreme Court&#039;s settled position on the scope of the exemption for imports, holding that later substitutions made by Notification No. 34/2015-CE and Notification No. 37/2015-CE operated prospectively only. The denial of CVD exemption was therefore unsustainable and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>