<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 604 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344333</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that a deduction under section 80IB(10), though not claimed in the original or revised return, can be considered where relevant material was placed on record during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal found such material had been filed by the assessee and directed reexamination by the Assessing Officer; the HC found this approach unexceptionable and declined to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s direction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 604 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344333</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that a deduction under section 80IB(10), though not claimed in the original or revised return, can be considered where relevant material was placed on record during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal found such material had been filed by the assessee and directed reexamination by the Assessing Officer; the HC found this approach unexceptionable and declined to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s direction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>