<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 597 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344326</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in a case involving various issues such as deletion of disallowance of leasehold/refurbishment expenses, addition of income accrued on preference share capital, disallowance of debt issue expenses, and disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to provident fund. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of refurbishment expenses disallowance, remitted the income addition matter back to the AO for verification, remitted the debt issue expenses disallowance for re-adjudication, and deleted the disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to provident fund. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with directions given to the AO for further computations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 597 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344326</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in a case involving various issues such as deletion of disallowance of leasehold/refurbishment expenses, addition of income accrued on preference share capital, disallowance of debt issue expenses, and disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to provident fund. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of refurbishment expenses disallowance, remitted the income addition matter back to the AO for verification, remitted the debt issue expenses disallowance for re-adjudication, and deleted the disallowance of employees&#039; contribution to provident fund. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with directions given to the AO for further computations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>