https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192722 A tenancy terminated under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 was treated as terminated by statute, so equity could not be used to defeat the landlord's statutory right to possession. Section 29(3) was read as permitting only orders consistent with the Act, and section 114 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was held inapplicable. The text also explains that a prior rent default remains relevant under section 25(2) even after relief is obtained under section 25(1), because such relief does not erase the underlying default. The statutory bar therefore applies once the prescribed three-year default condition is met. en-us Fri, 01 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:49:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192722 A tenancy terminated under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 was treated as terminated by statute, so equity could not be used to defeat the landlord's statutory right to possession. Section 29(3) was read as permitting only orders consistent with the Act, and section 114 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was held inapplicable. The text also explains that a prior rent default remains relevant under section 25(2) even after relief is obtained under section 25(1), because such relief does not erase the underlying default. The statutory bar therefore applies once the prescribed three-year default condition is met. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192722