<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1318 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192711</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, setting aside the additions of sundry creditors/trade creditors and non-deduction of TDS on brand charges for reconsideration by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal directed the AO to provide reasonable opportunities for the assessees to present their cases and to follow the reasoning given by the CIT(A) for a previous assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:02:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1318 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192711</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, setting aside the additions of sundry creditors/trade creditors and non-deduction of TDS on brand charges for reconsideration by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal directed the AO to provide reasonable opportunities for the assessees to present their cases and to follow the reasoning given by the CIT(A) for a previous assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>